WOMEN'S USE OF THE BIRTH PLAN DURING PRENATAL: SCOPING REVIEW
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31011/reaid-2023-v.97-n.2-art.1439Keywords:
Nursing Care; Obstetric Nursing; Pregnancy; Humanizing Delivery; Prenatal CareAbstract
Objective: to analyze the repercussions of the use of the birth plan in the parturition process by
women during prenatal care, through the literature. Method: this is a scope review built on the PCC
strategy, with "P" being the population (pregnant women), "C" being the concept (birth plan) and
"C" being the context (prenatal care). The search was performed in PubMed, Scopus and EMBASE
(Elsevier) databases. Studies were included in full in English, Spanish or Portuguese, which
involved the theme of the birth plan and had been published until March 2022. Data were collected
from January to March 2022. The selected texts were read in full and data extracted production
characterization, main results and the use of the birth plan was highlighted. Results: the final
sample consisted of 16 eligible articles, which were organized according to the flowchart according
to the PRISMA international guide. Most of the articles were published in 2020 and 2021 (n=4) and
originated in Spain (n=4), followed by Brazil and Africa (n=2). The main theme found was about
the use and construction of the birth plan, its benefits and improvement of the pregnant women's
experience. Conclusion: the birth plan is a flexible and adaptable instrument, the involvement and
participation of family members with professionals are essential in the production and realization of this planning, although it has many benefits, there are still gaps to be filled related to the construction and use of the birth plan. childbirth.
Downloads
References
Suárez-Cortés M, Armero-Barranco D, Canteras-Jordana M, Martínez-Roche ME. Use and influence of Delivery and Birth Plans in the humanizing delivery process. Rev Latino-Am Enfermagem [Internet]. may-jun 2015[cited 2022 May 24]; 23(3):520-6. Available from: https://www.scielo.br/j/rlae/a/CnCH3f9JjpyCsCStbtdrZfS/?format=pdf&lang=en doi: https://doi. org/10.1590/0104-1169.0067.2583.
Loiola AMR, Alves VH, Vieira BDG, Rodrigues DP, Souza KV, Marchiori GRS. Plano de parto como tecnologia do cuidado: experiência de puérperas em uma casa de parto. Cogitare Enfermagem [Internet]. 2020 [citado 2022 Maio 24]; 25: e66039. Disponível em: https://revistas.ufpr.br/cogitare/article/view/66039/pdf doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5380/ce.v25i0.66039.
Hidalgo-Lopezosa P, Cubero-Luna AM, Jiménez-Ruz A, Hidalgo-Maestre M, Rodríguez-Borrego MA, López-Soto PJ. Association between Birth Plan Use and Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in Southern Spain: A Case-Control Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2022 May 24];18(2): 456. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7828065/ doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ ijerph18020456
Medeiros RMK, Figueiredo G, Correa ACP, Barbieri M. Repercussões da utilização do plano de parto no processo de parturição. Rev Gaúch Enferm [Internet]. 2019[citado 2022 Maio 24];40:e20180233. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/scielo. php?pid=S1983-14472019000100504&script=sci_arttext&tlng=pt
Trigueiro TH, Pardo HN, Berteloni GMA, Franco CS, Wall ML, Souza SRRK. O uso do plano de parto por gestantes no pré-natal: uma revisão de escopo. REME - Rev Min Enferm [Internet]. 2021 [citado 2022 Maio 24];25:e-1391. Disponível em: https://cdn.publisher.gn1.link/reme.org.br/pdf/en_e1391.pdf. doi: 10.5935/1415.2762.20210039
Garcia MJS, Rojo FM, Castiñeiras JAG. Echevarría-Pérez P, Morales-Moreno I. Social perceptions and bioethical implications of birth plans: A qualitative study. Clinical Ethics. 2021;16(3):196-204. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1477750920971798
Cordeiro L, Soares CB. Revisão de escopo: potencialidades para a síntese de metodologias utilizadas em pesquisa primária qualitativa. BIS, Bol Inst Saúde (Impr.) [Internet]. dez 2020[citado 2022 Maio 24];20(2):37-43. Disponível em: https://periodicos.saude.sp.gov.br/bis/article/view/34471. doi: https://doi.org/10.52753/bis.2019.v20.34471
Bhatta DN. Involvement of males in antenatal care, birth preparedness, exclusive breast feeding and immunizations for children in Kathmandu, Nepal. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth [Internet]. jan 2013 [cited 2022 May 24];13-14. Available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/13/14 https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-14
Aragon M, Chhoa E, Dayan R, Kluftinger A, Lohn Z, Buhler K. Perspectives of expectant women and health care providers on birth plans. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. Nov 2013;35(11):979-85. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30785-4.
Kalisa R, Malande OO. Birth preparedness, complication readiness and male partner involvement for obstetric emergencies in rural Rwanda. Pan Afr Med J [Internet]. 2016[cited 2022 May 24];25:91. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5325493 doi: 10.11604/pamj.2016.25.91.9710. eCollection 2016.
Feeley C, Thomson G. Why do some women choose to freebirth in the UK? An interpretative phenomenological study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2022 May 24];16:59. Available from: https://bmcpregnancychildbirth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12884-016-0847-6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-0847-6
Heidi P, Miri G, Uzi D, Yael B. A quantitative investigation into women's basic beliefs about birth and planned birth choices. Midwifery. Aug 2018[cited 2022 May 24];46:51. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2018.05.002.
Colley S, Kao CH, Gau M. Cheng SF. Women’s perception of support and control during childbirth in The Gambia, a quantitative study on dignified facility-based intrapartum care. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth [Internet]. 2018[cited 2022 May 24];18:413. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6199796/pdf/12884_2018_Article_2025.pdf https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-2025-5
Narchi NZ, Venâncio KCMP, Ferreira FM, Vieira JR. Individual birth planning as a teaching-learning strategy for good practices in obstetric care. Rev Esc Enferm USP[Internet]. 2019[cited 2022 May 24];53:e03518. [Internet]. Available from: https://www.scielo.br/j/reeusp/a/dNPK3CC4bCn5XKLhRDfnMnm/?format=pdf&lang=en. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1980-220X2018009103518
Silva TM, Lopes MI. A expectativa do casal sobre o plano de parto. Rev Enferm Ref [Internet]. 2020 [citado 2022 Maio 24];5(2): e19095. Disponível em: https://scielo.pt/pdf/ref/vserVn2/vserVn2a02.pdf doi: 10.12707/RIV19095.
Naanyu V, Mujumdar V, Ahearn C. McConnell M, Cohen J. Why do women deliver where they had not planned to go? A qualitative study from peri-urban Nairobi Kenya. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth [Internet]. 2020[cited 2022 May 24];20:30. Available from: https://bmcpregnancychildbirth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12884-019-2695-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2695-7
López-Toribio M, Bravo P, Llupià A. Exploring women’s experiences of participation in shared decision-making during childbirth: a qualitative study at a reference hospital in Spain. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth [Internet]. 2021[citado 2022 Maio 24];21:631. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8447503/pdf/12884_2021_Article_4070.pdf doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-04070-3
Collins CC, Rice H, Bai R, Brown PL, Bronson C, Farmer C. "I felt like it would've been perfect, if they hadn't been rushing": Black women's childbirth experiences with medical providers when accompanied by perinatal support professionals. J Adv Nurs. 2021 Oct;77(10):4131-41. doi: 10.1111/jan.14941. Epub 2021 Jun 16. PMID: 34137066.
Colomar M, Opiyo N, Kingdon C, Long Q, Nion S, Bohren MA, et al. Do women prefer caesarean sections? A qualitative evidence synthesis of their views and experiences. PLoS ONE [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2022 May 24]; 16(5): e0251072. Available from: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0251072. doi; https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0251072
